Key to Reasonable Compensation: Relate the Surveys to the Specific Professional

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 13 No. 3
Legal and Court Case Update
March 2007

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (595 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
Ackerman v Ackerman
2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 2056
December 27, 2006
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeals
Brian G. Saylin, Ellen G. Winterbottom, Jeffrey W. Doeringer, Keith E. Dolnick
James Christensen (husband); Glenn Mehner (wife)
Rylaarsdam

Summary

In reasonable compensation case, trial court discredits salary surveys not sufficiently “fine-tuned” to area and type of practice of the subject practitioner.

See Also

Ackerman v. Ackerman

Full Text of Court Cases
December 27, 2006

In reasonable compensation case, trial court discredits salary surveys not sufficiently “fine-tuned” to area and type of practice of the subject practitioner.