Expert’s ‘Hyperbole’ in Article Comes Back to Haunt in Daubert Hearing

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2011

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,010 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
bankruptcy
Nelson v. Walnut Investment Partners
2011 WL 2711318 (S.D. Ohio)
July 13, 2011
US
Federal Court
Ohio
United States District Court
Robert Ferguson (plaintiff); Jeffrey Risius (defendants)
Spiegel

Summary

Bankruptcy court denies Daubert motion and grants summary judgment based largely on expert insolvency analysis, despite “professional” disagreement on data used to calculate small stock premium, cost of debt, and company-specific risk premium.

See Also

Nelson v. Walnut Investment Partners

Full Text of Court Cases
July 13, 2011

Bankruptcy court denies Daubert motion and grants summary judgment based largely on expert insolvency analysis, despite “professional” disagreement on data used to calculate small stock premium, cost of debt, and company-specific risk premium.