Nelson v. Walnut Investment Partners

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 13, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,846 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
bankruptcy
Nelson v. Walnut Investment Partners
2011 WL 2711318 (S.D. Ohio)
US
Federal Court
Ohio
United States District Court
Robert Ferguson (plaintiff); Jeffrey Risius (defendants)
Spiegel

Summary

Bankruptcy court denies Daubert motion and grants summary judgment based largely on expert insolvency analysis, despite “professional” disagreement on data used to calculate small stock premium, cost of debt, and company-specific risk premium.
Nelson v. Walnut Investment Partners
PDF, Size: 82 KB

See Also

Expert’s ‘Hyperbole’ in Article Comes Back to Haunt in Daubert Hearing

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2011

Bankruptcy court denies Daubert motion and grants summary judgment based largely on expert insolvency analysis, despite “professional” disagreement on data used to calculate small stock premium, cost of debt, and company-specific risk premium.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar