Aversion to 'Costly Appraisal' Lands Majority in Court: 'Transaction Method' Carries the Day

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 11 No. 1
Legal and Court Case Update
January 2005

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,284 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6719 Offices of Holding Companies, NEC
551112 Offices of Other Holding Companies
shareholder dissent/oppression
Dobler v. Montgomery
2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 139
September 30, 2004
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Arthur G. House, David A. Jenkins, Dawn M. Jones, Laura C. Mow, Martin S. Lessner, Michele C. Gott, Thomas J. Dougherty
Marc B. Sherman (for Dobler)<br>Kenneth D. Gartrell (for Montgomery)
Lamb

Summary

The issue in this appraisal action was the value of Montgomery Cellular (MCHC), a telecommunications holding company.

See Also

Dobler v. Montgomery

Full Text of Court Cases
September 30, 2004

The issue in this appraisal action was the value of Montgomery Cellular (MCHC), a telecommunications holding company.