Dobler v. Montgomery

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 30, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (14,455 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6719 Offices of Holding Companies, NEC
551112 Offices of Other Holding Companies
shareholder dissent/oppression
Dobler v. Montgomery
2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 139
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Arthur G. House, David A. Jenkins, Dawn M. Jones, Laura C. Mow, Martin S. Lessner, Michele C. Gott, Thomas J. Dougherty
Marc B. Sherman (for Dobler)<br>Kenneth D. Gartrell (for Montgomery)
Lamb

Summary

The issue in this appraisal action was the value of Montgomery Cellular (MCHC), a telecommunications holding company.
Dobler v. Montgomery
PDF, Size: 134 KB

See Also

Aversion to 'Costly Appraisal' Lands Majority in Court: 'Transaction Method' Carries the Day

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2005

The issue in this appraisal action was the value of Montgomery Cellular (MCHC), a telecommunications holding company.

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel