Apple Fails in Last-Ditch Effort to Offer Nonexpert Lost Profits Theory

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 20 No. 1
Legal and Court Case Update
January 2014

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (960 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
lost profits, expert testimony, panduit, but for causation, non-infringing alternative
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (III)
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162863
November 12, 2013
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Terry Musika, Julie L. Davis (plaintiff); Michael Wagner (defendants)
Koh

Summary

District court grants Samsung’s emergency motion to preclude Apple from introducing a lost profits theory for several patents that runs counter to the Panduit-based damages model its own experts had developed, calling the new, non-expert alternative theor ...

See Also

Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (III)

Full Text of Court Cases
November 12, 2013

District court grants Samsung’s emergency motion to preclude Apple from introducing a lost profits theory for several patents that runs counter to the Panduit-based damages model its own experts had developed, calling the new, non-expert alternative theor ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 20 No. 1
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition