Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (III)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 12, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,218 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
lost profits, expert testimony, panduit, but for causation, non-infringing alternative
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (III)
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162863
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Terry Musika, Julie L. Davis (plaintiff); Michael Wagner (defendants)
Koh

Summary

District court grants Samsung’s emergency motion to preclude Apple from introducing a lost profits theory for several patents that runs counter to the Panduit-based damages model its own experts had developed, calling the new, non-expert alternative theor ...
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (III)
PDF, Size: 45 KB

See Also

Apple Fails in Last-Ditch Effort to Offer Nonexpert Lost Profits Theory

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2014

District court grants Samsung’s emergency motion to preclude Apple from introducing a lost profits theory for several patents that runs counter to the Panduit-based damages model its own experts had developed, calling the new, non-expert alternative theor ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition