Stuart Agranoff, et al. v. Edward M. Miller, et al.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 15, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (12,777 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5421 Meat and Fish (Seafood) Markets, Including Freezer Provisioners
Stuart Agranoff, et al. v. Edward M. Miller, et al.
CA No. 16795 (Del. Ch. 2001)
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Morton Mark Lee <br>
Strine

Summary

The Delaware Court of Chancery considered the fair value and the fair market value of warrants in an express delivery business. The court rejected a valuation using the discounted cash flow method in favor of a public guideline company method valuation. I ...
Stuart Agranoff, et al. v. Edward M. Miller, et al.
PDF, Size: 431 KB

See Also

Fair Market Value and Fair Value Determined

Legal and Court Case Update
May 15, 2001

The Delaware Court of Chancery considered the fair value and the fair market value of warrants in an express delivery business. The court rejected a valuation using the discounted cash flow method in favor of a public guideline company method valuation. I ...

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel