StoneEagle Servs., Inc. v. Pay-Plus Solutions, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 19, 2015
522320 Financial Transactions Processing, Reserve, and Clearinghouse Activities
intellectual property
damages, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, georgia-pacific, market approach, reasonable royalty, rule 702, reliability

StoneEagle Servs., Inc. v. Pay-Plus Solutions, Inc.
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79971
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
Weston Anson (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Hernandez Covington

Summary

Court says market approach is “sound and reliable methodology” for calculating reasonable royalty and denies defendants’ Daubert motion to preclude plaintiff’s expert from testifying why he declined to use Georgia-Pacific factors in this case.
StoneEagle Servs., Inc. v. Pay-Plus Solutions, Inc.
PDF, Size: 114 KB