Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (IV)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 15, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,872 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
economic damages & lost profits
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (IV)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35393
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Ian Cockburn (plaintiff); Alan Cox and Gregory Leonard (defendant)
Alsup

Summary

Federal district court strikes portions of supplemental reports submitted by defendant’s rebuttal witnesses, in part because the patent expert’s failed to analyze predecessors to the patents in suit and the copyright expert applied new methodologies.
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (IV)
PDF, Size: 47 KB

See Also

Google Experts Also Err and Try to Add New Approaches

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2012

Federal district court strikes portions of supplemental reports submitted by defendant’s rebuttal witnesses, in part because the patent expert’s failed to analyze predecessors to the patents in suit and the copyright expert applied new methodologies.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar