LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc. (V)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 30, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (14,957 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5045 Computers and Computer Peripheral Equipment and Software
334112 Computer Storage Device Manufacturing
intellectual property
economic damages & lost profits
LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc. (V)
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18441
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Emmett Murtha (plaintiff); Brett Reed (defendant)
Reyna

Summary

Federal Circuit requires the apportionment analysis for patent infringement claims to focus on the “smallest saleable unit.”
LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc. (V)
PDF, Size: 207 KB

See Also

Federal Circuit Restricts Patent Damages to ‘Smallest Salable Infringing Unit’

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2012

Federal Circuit requires the apportionment analysis for patent infringement claims to focus on the “smallest saleable unit.”

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar