KW Plastics v. United States Can Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 1, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,643 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3411 Metal Cans
332431 Metal Can Manufacturing
intellectual property
daubert, expert testimony, economic damages & lost profits
KW Plastics v. United States Can Co.
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1630
US
Federal Court
Alabama
United States District Court
John McGowan (for U.S. Can)
DeMent

Summary

At issue is the admittance of expert testimony.

See Also

Trial Court Excludes Expert Testimony as Unreliable Under Daubert and Kumho

Legal and Court Case Update
February 1, 2001

The issue in this litigation between two can manufacturers was the plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude the expert testimony of the defendant's CFO, John McGowan , as to damages for lost ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition