Jack Tyler Engineering Co. v. Colfax Corp.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 10, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,277 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3559 Special Industry Machinery, NEC
331318 Other Aluminum Rolling, Drawing, and Extruding
contract
Jack Tyler Engineering Co. v. Colfax Corp.
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51603
US
Federal Court
Tennessee
United States District Court
Dr. Ralph Scott (plaintiff); Z. Christopher Mercer (defendant)
Cleland

Summary

In Daubert ruling, court says expert’s lost profits calculation based on discounted cash flow (DCF) method is reliable; plaintiff’s expert properly determined discount factor based on identified sources and made permissible judgment calls based on his exp ...
Jack Tyler Engineering Co. v. Colfax Corp.
PDF, Size: 28 KB

See Also

Discount Rate Analysis Requires Expert’s Subjective Judgments

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2013

In Daubert ruling, court says expert’s lost profits calculation based on discounted cash flow (DCF) method is reliable; plaintiff’s expert properly determined discount factor based on identified sources and made permissible judgment calls based on his exp ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar