Interplan Architects, Inc. v. C.L. Thomas, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 8, 2010

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (12,707 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8712 Architectural Services
541310 Architectural Services
intellectual property
Interplan Architects, Inc. v. C.L. Thomas, Inc.
2010 WL 3982273 (S.D. Tex.)
US
Federal Court
Texas
United States District Court
Walter Bratic (plaintiff); James Mandel, Frances Bologna, and Kenneth Kolkhurst (defendant)
Ellison

Summary

Court excludes expert evidence regarding copyright infringement that does not provide specific causal link between defendant’s gross revenues from infringement and the copyrighted works.
Interplan Architects, Inc. v. C.L. Thomas, Inc.
PDF, Size: 122 KB

See Also

Experts Need to Link Copyright Infringement to Specific Lost Revenues

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2011

Court excludes expert evidence regarding copyright infringement that does not provide specific causal link between defendant’s gross revenues from infringement and the copyrighted works.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition