Experts Need to Link Copyright Infringement to Specific Lost Revenues

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 1
Legal and Court Case Update
January 2011

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,043 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8712 Architectural Services
541310 Architectural Services
intellectual property
Interplan Architects, Inc. v. C.L. Thomas, Inc.
2010 WL 3982273 (S.D. Tex.)
October 8, 2010
US
Federal Court
Texas
United States District Court
Walter Bratic (plaintiff); James Mandel, Frances Bologna, and Kenneth Kolkhurst (defendant)
Ellison

Summary

Court excludes expert evidence regarding copyright infringement that does not provide specific causal link between defendant’s gross revenues from infringement and the copyrighted works.

See Also

Interplan Architects, Inc. v. C.L. Thomas, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
October 8, 2010

Court excludes expert evidence regarding copyright infringement that does not provide specific causal link between defendant’s gross revenues from infringement and the copyrighted works.