In re Hanover Direct, Inc. Shareholder’s Litigation

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 24, 2010

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,710 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5023 Home Furnishings
423220 Home Furnishing Merchant Wholesalers
shareholder dissent/oppression
In re Hanover Direct, Inc. Shareholder’s Litigation
Consol. C.A. No. 1969-CC, letter op.
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Bruce L. Silverstein, Elena C. Norman, James M. Yoch, Jessica Zeldin, Lisa Zwally Brown, R. Montgomery Donaldson, Tammy L. Mercer
David Clarke (respondents)
Chandler

Summary

Delaware Chancery court finds “battle of the experts” is entirely one-sided, based on petitioner’s expert using only one valuation method, “fraught with error.”
In re Hanover Direct, Inc. Shareholder’s Litigation
PDF, Size: 35 KB

See Also

Delaware Chancery Encourages Experts to Use More Than One Valuation Method

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2010

Delaware Chancery court finds “battle of the experts” is entirely one-sided, based on petitioner’s expert using only one valuation method, “fraught with error.”

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel