Harris v. Koenig

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 27, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,038 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
ESOP valuations
Harris v. Koenig
2011 WL 2531257 (D. D.C.)
US
Federal Court
District of Columbia
United States District Court
Saul Solomon
Kessler

Summary

Court upholds the alternative investment method used by ESOP expert to support claims that plan trustee breached its fiduciary duty by imprudently investing in stocks it knew to be artificially inflated by accounting improprieties.
Harris v. Koenig
PDF, Size: 38 KB

See Also

ESOP Expert Attacked for Using ‘Alternative Investment Method’

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2011

Court upholds the alternative investment method ESOP expert used to support claims that plan trustee breached its fiduciary duty by imprudently investing in stocks it knew to be artificially inflated by accounting improprieties.

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar