Enpat, Inc. v. Budnic

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 28, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,915 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3728 Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
336413 Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
patent infringement, economic damages & lost profits, georgia-pacific
Enpat, Inc. v. Budnic
2011 WL 768092 (M.D. Fla.)
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
Fawsett

Summary

Federal court denies plaintiff’s request to prorate past patent infringement damages from actual prior licenses without additional evidence that the parties’ would have used a similar proration during hypothetical negotiations.
Enpat, Inc. v. Budnic
PDF, Size: 44 KB

See Also

More Proof That Federal Courts Require More Precision in Calculating Patent Damages

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2011

Federal court denies plaintiff’s request to prorate past patent infringement damages from actual prior licenses without additional evidence that the parties’ would have used a similar proration during hypothetical negotiations.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition