More Proof That Federal Courts Require More Precision in Calculating Patent Damages

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2011

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (473 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3728 Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
336413 Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
patent infringement, economic damages & lost profits, georgia-pacific
Enpat, Inc. v. Budnic
2011 WL 768092 (M.D. Fla.)
February 28, 2011
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
Fawsett

Summary

Federal court denies plaintiff’s request to prorate past patent infringement damages from actual prior licenses without additional evidence that the parties’ would have used a similar proration during hypothetical negotiations.

See Also

Enpat, Inc. v. Budnic

Full Text of Court Cases
February 28, 2011

Federal court denies plaintiff’s request to prorate past patent infringement damages from actual prior licenses without additional evidence that the parties’ would have used a similar proration during hypothetical negotiations.