Doft & Co. v. Travelocity.com Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 20, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (9,595 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4724 Travel Agencies
561510 Travel Agencies
shareholder dissent/oppression
Doft & Co. v. Travelocity.com Inc.
2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 75
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Alan J. Stone, James G. McMillan III, Norman M. Monhait, Thomas M. Skelton
William H. Purcell (for shareholder), Paul A. Gompers (for Travelocity)
Lamb

Summary

A minority shareholder of Travelocity.com Inc. (Travelocity) brought a dissenting shareholder action contesting the $28 per share it received in a short-form merger of Travelocity and seeking a determination of the fair value of its shares.
Doft & Co. v. Travelocity.com Inc.
PDF, Size: 88 KB

See Also

Court Rejects DCF and Uses Comparable Public Company Method

Legal and Court Case Update
April 2005

A minority shareholder of Travelocity.com Inc. (Travelocity) brought a dissenting shareholder action contesting the $28 per share it received in a short-form merger of Travelocity and seeking a determination of the fair value of its shares.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel