AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 21, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (4,872 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
intellectual property
AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation (II)
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23768
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
Larry Evans (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
Andrews

Summary

Federal court grants defendant’s Daubert motion to exclude plaintiff’s damages testimony, because the expert failed to show how a single “comparable” settlement agreement that covered a different patent was a reliable basis for his reasonable royalty calc ...
AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation (II)
PDF, Size: 319 KB

See Also

Failure to Analyze Settlement Agreement Dooms Damages Theory

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2013

Federal court grants defendant’s Daubert motion to exclude plaintiff’s damages testimony, because the expert failed to show how a single “comparable” settlement agreement that covered a different patent was a reliable basis for his reasonable royalty calc ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar