Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 10, 2009

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,440 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3643 Current-Carrying Wiring Devices
335931 Current-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing
intellectual property
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
2009 WL 2973472 (M. D. Pa.)
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
Mark Gallagher (plaintiff)
Conner

Summary

By applying appropriate legal standard (Panduit factors) in infringement case, damages expert defeats Daubert challenge.
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
PDF, Size: 127 KB

See Also

Understanding the Law Can Boost Expert’s Credibility

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2009

By applying appropriate legal standard (Panduit factors) in infringement case, damages expert defeats Daubert challenge.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar