Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 22, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (12,874 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. (II)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89960
US
Federal Court
Illinois
United States District Court
Brian Napper and Nathaniel Polish (plaintiff); Charles Donahue (defendant)
Posner

Summary

After excluding the parties’ damages experts under Daubert, the court finds no credible evidence remains to support their claims for patent infringement, damages, or equitable relief (either permanent injunctions or prospective royalties).
Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. (II)
PDF, Size: 275 KB

See Also

Last-Minute Efforts to Save Patent Claims Sans Damages Experts

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2012

After excluding the parties’ damages experts under Daubert, the court finds no credible evidence remains to support their claims for patent infringement, damages, or equitable relief (either permanent injunctions or prospective royalties).

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition