Last-Minute Efforts to Save Patent Claims Sans Damages Experts

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2012
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property

Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. (II)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89960
June 22, 2012
US
Federal Court
Illinois
United States District Court
Brian Napper and Nathaniel Polish (plaintiff); Charles Donahue (defendant)
Posner

Summary

After excluding the parties’ damages experts under Daubert, the court finds no credible evidence remains to support their claims for patent infringement, damages, or equitable relief (either permanent injunctions or prospective royalties).

See Also

Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. (II)

After excluding the parties’ damages experts under Daubert, the court finds no credible evidence remains to support their claims for patent infringement, damages, or equitable relief (either permanent injunctions or prospective royalties).