Under Daubert, Damages Calculation Need Not Replicate Corporate Structure

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
January 4, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,201 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8071 Medical Laboratories
621511 Medical Laboratories
contract
lost profits, daubert, discount rate, expert testimony, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), admissibility, rule 702, reliability, relevant, present value
Radiologix, Inc. v. Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, LLC
2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1450
US
Federal Court
Kansas
United States District Court
Marc Vianello (plaintiffs); unknown (defendant)
Crabtree

Summary

Court admits expert calculation that determines one set of damages for two related plaintiff entities and that relies on data from nonparty parent entity; court finds calculation need not precisely track corporate structure to meet Daubert requirements.

See Also

Radiologix, Inc. v. Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, LLC

Full Text of Court Cases
January 4, 2018

Court admits expert calculation that determines one set of damages for two related plaintiff entities and that relies on data from nonparty parent entity; court finds calculation need not precisely track corporate structure to meet Daubert requirements.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition