Plaintiff’s COVID-Related Contract Claim Falters Despite Force Majeure Provision

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
June 5, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,065 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7382 Security Systems Services
561621 Security Systems Services (except Locksmiths)
economic damages & lost profits
damages, breach of contract, liability, COVID-19, Force majeure
NetOne, Inc. v. Panache Destination Management
2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99089
US
Federal Court
Hawaii
United States District Court
N/A
Watson

Summary

Court says plaintiff fails to show defendant breached contract in COVID-19-related damages case; plaintiff’s invocation of force majeure clause is futile where clause is silent as to whether plaintiff has a right to full deposit after termination of contract due to imposed travel restrictions.

See Also

NetOne, Inc. v. Panache Destination Management

Full Text of Court Cases
June 5, 2020

Court says plaintiff fails to show defendant breached contract in COVID-19-related damages case; plaintiff’s invocation of force majeure clause is futile where clause is silent as to whether plaintiff has a right to full deposit after termination of contract due to imposed travel restrictions.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition