In COVID-19 Business Interruption Case, Court Finds Business Adequately Alleges It Suffered a Physical Loss

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
August 12, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (828 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7231 Beauty Shops
812112 Beauty Salons
economic damages & lost profits
discovery, insurance, business interruption loss, coronavirus, COVID-19, business interruption, physical loss
Studio 417 v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.
2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147600
US
Federal Court
Missouri
United States District Court
N/A
Bough

Summary

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court declined to grant a motion to dismiss claims of plaintiffs; plaintiffs, inter alia, adequately allege that they suffered a physical loss due to COVID-19.

See Also

Studio 417 v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Full Text of Court Cases
August 12, 2020

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court declined to grant a motion to dismiss claims of plaintiffs; plaintiffs, inter alia, adequately allege that they suffered a physical loss due to COVID-19.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition