Combined Expert Testimony May Provide Valid Damages Framework

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
November 28, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,512 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4311 United States Postal Service
491110 Postal Service
economic damages & lost profits
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, causation, reliability, relevant, measure of damages, speculative
United States ex rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.
2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195558
US
Federal Court
District of Columbia
United States District Court
Larry Gerbrandt, Dr. Brian Till, Dr. Jonathan Walker (government/intervenor); Douglas Kidder, Dr. John Gleaves (defendants)
Cooper

Summary

In Daubert case, court finds government’s combined expert testimony concerning financial impact of negative publicity on sponsor (USPS) of Lance Armstrong and his cycling team provides “sufficiently non-speculative framework for determining damages.”

See Also

United States ex rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.

Full Text of Court Cases
November 28, 2017

In Daubert case, court finds government’s combined expert testimony concerning financial impact of negative publicity on sponsor (USPS) of Lance Armstrong and his cycling team provides “sufficiently non-speculative framework for determining damages.”

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition