Unvested Stock Options Are Not Subject to Division

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
February 7, 2001
5331 Variety Stores
452319 All Other General Merchandise Stores
marital dissolution/divorce

Mona G. Erickson v. Robert D. Erickson
No. CA 00-421 (Ark. App. 2001), unpublished
US
State Court
Arkansas
Court of Appeals
Neal

Summary

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s finding that unvested stock options in Wal-Mart were not property subject to division in divorce because they could be unilaterally terminated by the employer without terminating the employment rela ...

See Also

Mona G. Erickson v. Robert D. Erickson

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s finding that unvested stock options in Wal-Mart were not property subject to division in divorce because they could be unilaterally terminated by the employer without terminating the employment rela ...