Stock restriction agreement is not determinative of value for equitable distribution

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 11 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2005

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (282 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
income approach, capitalization of earnings, marital dissolution, market approach, stock restriction agreement
Bersin v. Golonka
2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 1032
May 17, 2005
US
State Court
North Carolina
Court of Appeals
L. Stanley Brown, Michelle D. Reingold, Nelson M. Casstevens Jr.
George B. Hawkins (court appointed)
McCullough

Summary

One of the issues in this marital dissolution was the value of husband’s 1000 shares of nonvoting stock in the Sanger Clinic, P.A., where he was a senior partner.

See Also

Bersin v. Golonka

Full Text of Court Cases
May 17, 2005

One of the issues in this marital dissolution was the value of husband's 1000 shares of non-voting stock in the Sanger Clinic, P.A., where he was a senior partner.