Securities Fraud Also Requires ‘Precise’ Apportionment Analysis

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 11
Legal and Court Case Update
November 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,357 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6712 Offices of Bank Holding Companies
551111 Offices of Bank Holding Companies
securities litigation
Hubbard v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15134
July 23, 2012
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
Candace Preston
Tjoflat

Summary

: 11th Circuit confirms reversal of securities fraud violation by Florida-based bank, based on failure by the plaintiff’s financial expert to apportion the amount of stock losses between the alleged fraud and other market and industry risks, particularly ...

See Also

Hubbard v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
July 23, 2012

11th Circuit confirms reversal of securities fraud violation by Florida-based bank, based on failure by the plaintiff’s financial expert to apportion the amount of stock losses between the alleged fraud and other market and industry risks, particularly th ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 11
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition