Rebuttal Expert May Be Redundant in Offering Only a Critique

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (840 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
1521 General Contractors-Single-Family Houses
236115 New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders)
contract
damages, daubert hearing, lost profits, economic damages & lost profits, yardstick analysis
B-K Cypress Log Homes v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73773
May 25, 2012
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
Stanley Stephenson (plaintiff) and Jeffrey Harrison (defendant)
Jones

Summary

Court admits the “before and after” as well as the “yardstick” model developed by the plaintiff’s lost profits expert, leaving questions regarding the underlying assumptions and data for cross-examination at trial, but excludes the defendant’s rebuttal wi ...

See Also

B-K Cypress Log Homes v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company

Full Text of Court Cases
May 25, 2012

Court admits the “before and after” as well as the “yardstick” model developed by the plaintiff’s lost profits expert, leaving questions regarding the underlying assumptions and data for cross-examination at trial, but excludes the defendant’s rebuttal wi ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 8
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition