Owner’s Confusing, Handwritten Lost Profits Assessment Resulted in Directed Verdict

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
September 1, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (476 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3537 Industrial Trucks, Tractors, Trailers, and Stackers
333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing
contract
damages, lost profits, breach of contract
Fabrication & Truck Equipment, Inc. v. Roger M. Powell
No. A120008 (Or. App. 2004)
US
State Court
Oregon
Court of Appeals
Claud Ingram, Neil H. Robblee
Haselton

Summary

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s dismissal of a breach of contract action, which was predicated on the insufficient proof of damages submitted by Fabrication’s owner in a confusing and handwritten statement.

See Also

Fabrication & Truck Equipment, Inc. v. Roger M. Powell

Full Text of Court Cases
September 1, 2004

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s dismissal of a breach of contract action, which was predicated on the insufficient proof of damages submitted by Fabrication’s owner in a confusing and handwritten statement.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition