New York court pays lip service to Daubert while admitting expert testimony arguably unreliable under analysis of factors

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
November 9, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,493 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6211 Security Brokers, Dealers, and Flotation Companies
523110 Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
Primavera Familienstifung v. Askin
Primavera Familienstifung v. Askin 130 F. Supp. 2d 450, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 944
US
Federal Court
New York
United States District Court
John Y. Campbell<br>Burton G. Malkiel<br>Atanu Saha
Sweet

Summary

This is a class action of securities fraud litigation in which the defendants moved for summary judgment as to various claims. As part of this proceeding, one of the defendants (defendant) m ...

See Also

Primavera Familienstifung v. Askin

Full Text of Court Cases
January 17, 2004

Two issues in this case were a new pricing method for collateralized mortgage obligations, and a evaluation of Daubert standards for expert testimony.