Legal Precedent Is Key to Lost Profits Model in Savings and Loan Case

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 13 No. 1
Legal and Court Case Update
January 2007

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (849 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6022 State Commercial Banks
522110 Commercial Banking
winstar
First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States
2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 330
October 31, 2006
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Court of Federal Claims
David M. Cohen, Edward L. Lublin, Elizabeth A. Holt, Jeanne E. Davidson, John J. Todor, Katia I. Fano, Lawrence S. Sher, Paul M. Honigberg, Scott D. Austin, Stuart E. Schiffer, William G. Kanellis
Donald Kaplan (plaintiff); David Kennedy (defendant)
Margolis

Summary

Court trim lost profits/expectancy damages based on findings of inaccurate assumptions by valuation expert.

See Also

First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States

Full Text of Court Cases
October 31, 2006

Court trim lost profits/expectancy damages based on findings of inaccurate assumptions by valuation expert.