It’s Critical to Apply Correct Measure of Lost Business Value

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 2
Legal and Court Case Update
February 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,135 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6411 Insurance Agents, Brokers, and Service
524210 Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
tort
Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc. v. Firstate Insurance Holdings, Inc.
2011 WL 4577530 (Fla. App. 4 Dist.)
October 5, 2011
US
State Court
Florida
Court of Appeals
Ronald Patella
Ciklin

Summary

District court reverses $3.5 million award for lost business value due to expert’s use of incorrect measure of damages (income approach), and because owner’s attempt to cure by testifying as to market value was unfair surprise and speculative.

See Also

Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc. v. Firstate Insurance Holdings, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
October 5, 2011

District court reverses $3.5 million award for lost business value due to expert’s use of incorrect measure of damages (income approach), and because owner’s attempt to cure by testifying as to market value was unfair surprise and speculative.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 2
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition