IRS Reliance on Valuation Position Substantially Justified

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 9 No. 2
Legal and Court Case Update
February 2003

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (379 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
estate and gift taxation
Estate of Dailey v. Commissioner (II)
T.C. Memo 2002-301
December 9, 2002
US
Federal Court
United States Tax Court
Jeffrey A. Schumacher (for petitioners)
Foley

Summary

This case is a follow-up to the substantive issues addressed in Estate of Dailey v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2001-263 (U.S. Tax Ct. Oct. 3, 2001), which was abstracted in the December 2001 issue of the Business Valuation Update.

See Also

Estate of Dailey v. Commissioner (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
December 9, 2002

At issue is whether respondent's position relating to the valuation issue was substantially justified, and whether costs relating to the FLP issue are reasonable.