Expert’s Methodology Should Be Challenged at Daubert Hearings, Not the Conclusions

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
September 26, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (831 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
contract
breach of contract, admissibility
ProtoComm Corp. v. Novell Advanced Services, Inc. et al.
No. 98-3819 (E.D. Penn. 2001)
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
Michael Pakter, CPA, Gabriel F. Nagy, ASA, Ellis L. Levin, CPA, CFE
Reed, Sr.

Summary

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania considered the admissibility of financial experts under Daubert.

See Also

ProtoComm Corp. v. Novell Advanced Services, Inc. et al.

Full Text of Court Cases
September 26, 2001

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania considered the admissibility of financial experts under Daubert.