Summary
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s use of the Bogosian short-cut, supported by expert economic testimony, to show that all members of the purported class were damaged by the alleged anticompetitive behavior when ...
See Also
In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation: Winoff Industries, Inc. v. Stone Container Corporation
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s use of the Bogosian short-cut, supported by expert economic testimony, to show that all members of the purported class were damaged by the alleged anticompetitive behavior when ...