Does Use of Full Product Line Data Invalidate Damages Formulation?

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (970 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5941 Sporting Goods Stores and Bicycle Shops
451110 Sporting Goods Stores
intellectual property
Hark’n Technologies, Inc. v. Crossover Symmetry
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24644
February 21, 2013
US
Federal Court
Utah
United States District Court
Mark E. Elwood (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Stewart

Summary

In trade dress infringement suit, although court finds expert’s computation of the incremental profit percentage figure based on the plaintiff’s entire product line, rather than the products at issue, “troubling,” it concludes damages formula is admissibl ...

See Also

Hark’n Technologies, Inc. v. Crossover Symmetry

Full Text of Court Cases
February 21, 2013

In trade dress infringement suit, although court finds expert’s computation of the incremental profit percentage figure based on the plaintiff’s entire product line, rather than the products at issue, “troubling,” it concludes damages formula is admissibl ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 5
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition