Discount Rate, Management Projections, and More Decide State Fair Value Appraisal Action

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 16 No. 12
Legal and Court Case Update
December 2010

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,949 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3199 Leather Goods, NEC
316998 All Other Leather Good and Allied Product Manufacturing
shareholder dissent/oppression
Albert Trostel & Sons Co. v. Notz
2010 WL 1691869 (N.D. Cal.)
September 28, 2010
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States District Court
David Giesen (plaintiff/dissenting shareholder); Daniel Bayston (defendant/company)
Clevert

Summary

Statutory fair value appraisal of automotive company turns on DCF inputs, including discount rate and management projections, plus one expert’s better industry experience and analysis.

See Also

Albert Trostel & Sons Co. v. Notz

Full Text of Court Cases
September 28, 2010

Statutory fair value appraisal of automotive company turns on DCF inputs, including discount rate and management projections, plus one expert’s better industry experience and analysis.