Court Favors Expert Over Owners in Dissenting S/H Dispute

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,003 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4953 Refuse Systems
shareholder dissent/oppression
Rickert v. Dakota Sanitation Plus, Inc.
2012 N.D. LEXIS 24
February 17, 2012
US
State Court
North Dakota
Supreme Court
Dianna Kindseth
Kapsner

Summary

Fair value for dissenting shareholder does not include the actual profits of the company after the effective valuation date, in this case the dissolution of the corporation.

See Also

Rickert v. Dakota Sanitation Plus, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
February 17, 2012

Fair value for dissenting shareholder does not include the actual profits of the company after the effective valuation date, in this case the dissolution of the corporation.