Cost of Replacement Capital in Mitigation Model Must Be Based on Actual, Related Transactions

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 12 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2006

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (578 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6021 National Commercial Banks
522110 Commercial Banking
winstar
American Federal Bank v. United States
2005 U.S. Claims LEXIS 320
October 31, 2005
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Court of Federal Claims
David B. Bergman, David M. Cohen, Edward E. Sullivan, Howard N. Cayne, Jeanne E. Davidson, John N. Kane, Joshua P. Wilson, Mark Pittman, Michael A. Johnson, Michael A. Sackey, Sameer Yerawadekar, Stuart E. Schiffer, Timothy Abraham
Kormendi (plaintiff)
Lettow

Summary

Cost of replacement capital in mitigation model case must be based on actual events and not post-mitigation merger and issuance of common stock.

See Also

American Federal Bank v. United States

Full Text of Court Cases
October 31, 2005

Cost of replacement capital in mitigation model case must be based on actual events, and not post-mitigation merger and issuance of common stock.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 12 No. 5
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition