Summary
Appellate court upholds $553,000 valuation for medical practice based on trial court’s finding that by withholding financial information from wife’s expert, husband ended up discrediting his own expert’s valuation.
See Also
Hissa v. Hissa (II)
Appellate court upholds $553,000 valuation for medical practice based on trial court’s finding that by withholding financial information from wife’s expert, husband ended up discrediting his own expert’s valuation.