Assignee’s Low Valuation Does Not Control Patent Damages Calculation

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 7
Legal and Court Case Update
July 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (951 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5734 Computer and Computer Software Stores
443142 Electronics Stores
intellectual property
patent infringement, economic damages & lost profits, georgia-pacific
SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4275
April 17, 2013
US
Federal Court
Texas
United States District Court
Brett Reed (plaintiff); Dr. Charles R. Mahla (defendants)
Gilstrap

Summary

District court denies defendants’ post-trial challenge to $10 million jury award finding the fact that the patent assignee at the time of the hypothetical negotiation was worth less than its single patent-in-suit does not control the assessment of patent ...

See Also

SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
April 17, 2013

District court denies defendants’ post-trial challenge to $10 million jury award finding the fact that the patent assignee at the time of the hypothetical negotiation was worth less than its single patent-in-suit does not control the assessment of patent ...