Appreciation Must Be Linked to Stockholder’s Decision-Making Responsibility

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
June 29, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (235 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5521 Motor Vehicle Dealers (Used Only)
marital dissolution/divorce
Carl A. Weithman v. Joyce L. Weithman
No. 03-01-05 (Ohio App. 3 Dist. 2001)
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Shaw

Summary

The Ohio Court of Appeals, Third District reversed the lower court’s conclusion that appreciation in a separate property, closely held business interest was marital property. The court found that appreciation must be linked to the shareholder spouse’s bus ...

See Also

Carl A. Weithman v. Joyce L. Weithman

Full Text of Court Cases
June 29, 2001

The Ohio Court of Appeals, Third District reversed the lower court’s conclusion that appreciation in a separate property, closely held business interest was marital property. The court found that appreciation must be linked to the shareholder spouse’s bus ...