Trial Court Can’t Just 'Split the Difference'

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 10
Legal and Court Case Update
October 2011

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (131 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5921 Liquor Stores
445310 Beer, Wine, and Liquor Stores
marital dissolution/divorce
Vanzant v. Vanzant
2011WL3558151 (Fla. App. 1 Dist.)
August 15, 2011
US
State Court
Florida
Court of Appeals
Thomas, Wetherell, and Swanson

Summary

Appellate court reverses trial court’s valuation of the parties’ liquor business, finding that it apparently “split the difference” between the parties’ valuations without sufficient evidence in the record to support this median value.

See Also

Vanzant v. Vanzant

Full Text of Court Cases
August 15, 2011

Appellate court reverses trial court’s valuation of the parties’ liquor business, finding that it apparently “split the difference” between the parties’ valuations without sufficient evidence in the record to support this median value.