Court’s Decision Supported by 'Competent, Credible' Expert Evidence

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2011

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (153 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5812 Eating and Drinking Places
722513 Limited-Service Restaurants
marital dissolution/divorce
Kapadia v. Kapadia
2011 WL 1849407 (Ohio App. 8 Dist.)
May 12, 2011
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Robert Turner (wife); Robert Greenwald (husband)
Gallagher

Summary

Trial court did not err by accepting expert value that compared wife’s interest in chain of local sandwich stores to those found in mall and airport food courts; and by rejecting expert who valued it based on national franchise comparables.

See Also

Kapadia v. Kapadia

Full Text of Court Cases
May 12, 2011

Trial court did not err by accepting expert value that compared wife’s interest in chain of local sandwich stores to those found in mall and airport food courts; and by rejecting expert who valued it based on national franchise comparables.