A Tale of Two Experts: U.S. District Court Compares Competing Valuations, With Divergent Results

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 14 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2008

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,247 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3845 Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
expert testimony
Lyman v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.
2008 WL 2224352
May 27, 2008
US
Federal Court
Wisconsin
United States District Court
Daniel Gotter (plaintiff); Randall D. Wilson (defendant)
Randa

Summary

The need for independent verification of data and appraiser objectivity is stressed by the U.S. District Court, in a case where the two appraisers took notably different approaches.

See Also

Lyman v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
May 27, 2008

The need for independent verification of data and appraiser objectivity is stressed by the U.S. District Court, in a case where the two appraisers took notably different approaches.