Slatowski v. Sig Sauer, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 12, 2024
3484 Small Arms
332994 Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits
expert testimony, causation, deposition, liability, summary judgment

Slatowski v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42905; 2024 WL 1078198
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
James Tertin, William Vigilante Jr.
R Barclay Surrick

Summary

The defendant, an ICE officer, was injured when his pistol fired unintentionally. The defendant gun manufacturer, Sig Sauer, filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiff cannot establish its defective design product liability claim because the expert testimony it offered to prove causation was inadmissible and unreliable. The court granted the defendant’s motion.
Slatowski v. Sig Sauer
PDF, Size: 360 KB

See Also

Plaintiff Fails to Prove Causation—U.S. District Court (Pennsylvania) Grants Summary Judgment to Defendant

The defendant, an ICE officer, was injured when his pistol fired unintentionally. The defendant gun manufacturer, Sig Sauer, filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiff cannot establish its defective design product liability claim because the expert testimony it offered to prove causation was inadmissible and unreliable. The court granted the defendant’s motion.